By definition an instantaneous electric shower should be on its own circuit. The implication of your (somewhat short!) posting is (AFAICS) that the shower is on the ring main feeding the tumble dryer. If this is so, things aren't fine at all. We need more information about how the two things are wired in.
the shower was wired in by my friend martin because he knows about electrics. all i can say is that the cable goes through the bathroom wall, round the skirting board in the bedroom and into a socket.
ill ask martin tonight weather the shower is on the ring main feeding the socket.
As it's this sort of thing that is causing the government to make things difficult for most of the posters on this ng, I should keep your head down (and don't use "friends who know about electrics" ). Seriously and with the best intent.
"Dave Jones" wrote | > the shower was wired in by my friend martin because he knows
Insert here: f*ck all
| > about electrics. all i can say is that the cable goes through | > the bathroom wall, round the skirting board in the bedroom and | > into a socket. | I don't see how this can be, a shower wired via a 13amp plug would | blow the fuse in the plug as soon as you switched it on. | Something not quite right here!
It's wired into the *socket* I guess, not the plug.
Part P _is_ a nonsense, without doubt. This is yet another example of why.
How do you suppose part P is going to do anything to stop "martin who knows about electrics"? Its not like he cares enough to find out how to install a shower without doing it so badly that he risks (someone else's) life and limb in a multitude of ways. Do you suppose he is going to go to the effort of submitting a building notice as well?
Of course to the hard of thinking, wiring a shower from a spur off an existing final ring circuit would be a "minor work" and hence exempt. Adding a new circuit however would not. Assuming Martin does learn about part P that should be even more incentive to bodge it.
On Sat, 04 Dec 2004 01:33:17 GMT, "BigWallop" strung together this:
You've obviously missed the point, Martin knows nothing about electrics, he knows nothing about Part P. If Part P said 'no-one shall ever do electrics, ever' do you think Martin would know? No, therefore Part P isn't going to have an effect on bodging diyers.
My point was, that there is an increase in fixed wiring fault damage from DIY wiring systems, so Part P is going to be in place to cover insurance companies, and others, against paying out claims in such cases. If the wiring was found to have been carried out by an unqualified or incompetent person, the insurance company will not pay out a claim unless they have proof that the wiring was independently checked by a recognised test by a recognised registered person.
It's because of the increase in insurance claims that this new requirement is being brought in. It isn't just to make life difficult for the average sparkie in the street.
If Martins pal here had had a house fire due to Martins incompetence in wiring the shower, then Martins pal here would be told to go F* himself by the insurance company, because the installation was not up to the standards that the insurance want in his house. Every piece of electrical equipment, bought from a legitimate source, has a warning stating that it must be fitted by a qualified electrician, but Martins pal isn't, so his equipment is not going to be covered by warranty and, therefore, also isn't going to be covered by his house insurance company from now on either.
HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.