Contactless cards again! [OT in uk.d-i-y]

This article

formatting link
appears to vindicate what I have always said about contactless cards.

Not only are they vulnerable to fraud by villains with scanners who don't need to get close enough to arouse suspicion, but it now seems that they're also vulnerable to *accidental* use!

I'm very glad that I ditched my CapitalOne card when they insisted [1] on replacing it with a contactless card.

More and more financial institutions are now using these things, making it very difficult to avoid unless you do away with credit and debit cards altogether. I've unfortunately still ended up with one or two, but they never leave the house and are used only for on-line transactions.

The sooner the whole idea is re-thought, the better!

[1] Using the very dubious tactic of pretending that my previous card had been "compromised" (which I'm damn sure it hadn't!) in order to provide a pretext for needing to issue a new card long before the old one had expired.
Reply to
Roger Mills
Loading thread data ...

Can always re-purpose the tin foil from the hat to screen the card ;)

Reply to
Lee

You would need a ferrite-based card holder to deny magnetic field access. Could be a business opportunity.

rusty

Reply to
therustyone

There's several Youtube videos on disabling them but I suspect they're using US cards pre-Chip and Pin and it looks like you'd damage that area as well. Andy C

Reply to
Andy Cap

I don't believe I've seen one of these. Is it obvious what they are? Or might I find that the CC company sent me one when the current card expired and I didn't know it?

Reply to
Tim Streater

Put "contactless card symbol" into Google.

Reply to
Andy Cap

Mu-metal.

Reply to
Frank Erskine

I see, thanks. Hmmm, looks like it's too late.

Reply to
Tim Streater

Here's one company that has been offering products for several years. I expect there are others.

formatting link

Bernie

Reply to
Bernie Hunt

If you carry it around, keep it in a lead sheath!

Reply to
Roger Mills

But if the same issue applies to NFC mobiles, the ferrite will play merry hell with recpetion...

Reply to
polygonum

Silver is best, then copper, but aluminium foil seems quite good, as tested with Oyster cards, which use the same near field communication standards. Lead is likely to be relative non-conductive. Sandwiching them between two Oyster cards may also trigger a multiple card error.

You can get foil lined card sheaths, and even foil lined card wallets (e.g. google "rfid blocking wallet").

The foil probably detunes the circuit, as well as screening it.

Reply to
David Woolley

On Monday 20 May 2013 14:38 therustyone wrote in uk.d-i-y:

Or you could just tell your bank to replace them...

Reply to
Tim Watts

I seem to recall that my bank wrote to me saying they were going to issue these things, and to object if you did not want one. I did, and later they sent one anyway. I wrote and pointed out I had requested not to have one, and they said basically "tough, its policy now!"

Reply to
John Rumm

Probably needs to be a sandwich of mu-metal inside copper inside silver to get maximum screening in minimum thickness.

According to that R4 consumer programme some M&S terminals were particularly aggressive about using contactless cards at a distance.

It is clear folly to have contactless unvalidated transactions. No-one needs to be able to buy things whilst wizzing past on a water slide!

Reply to
Martin Brown

Advantage is they can probably only grab £20 at a time.

Depends how good you are at playing "guess the icon".

Contactless cards icon is "))))" with each one getting bigger.

If you have a Barclaycard chances are it as this functionality now.

Reply to
Martin Brown

A carefully placed drill hole should do the trick.

If anyone asks, you drilled it to keep cards on your keychain like those Tesco Clubcard thingies.

Theo

Reply to
Theo Markettos

Looking at BS ISO/IEC 14443-2 reveals that the operating frequency for these cards is 13.56 MHz - one of the ISM 'free-radiation' freqs.

Hence low-frequency screening techniques such as mu-metal aren't particularly relevant. Wrapping the card in aluminium foil ought to work fine. Ideally all the seams should make good contact, but you're not looking for a particularly high screening factor and more or less any sort of overall wrap ought to do the trick.

Reply to
Andy Wade

But they can probably do it multiple times before being asked for a PIN

- and rack up quite a bill in the process.

Reply to
Roger Mills

Roger Mills explained on 20/05/2013 :

A sheet of cooking foil, in with the notes of your wallet, would probably be enough to defeat it.

Reply to
Harry Bloomfield

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.