But .. the former will see you on a much clearer part of the spectrum;)...
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Cat5 - Shielded or not
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
I learnt that as "Rules are for fools and the guidance of wise men."
SteveW
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
"Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obedience of fools "
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
A wise man will know why there is a rule, a fool will think he is a wise man.
Building regs are the minimum standard not the target.
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Unshielded CAT5 more than good enough.
WiFi 802.11.N is currently as good as it gets and is still unreliable in domestic premises.... you may have a 100MB router, but if you want to see how bad it is run a speed test at 15m away, performance drops incredibly ... especially if walls in the way.
802.11 N gives multiple frequency and antenna's to try and overcome signal blocking, but although signal gets through, throughput is dramatically affected.