We see far, far more of it in masonry houses with fully skilled people.
Ever seen a SIP? Of couse you haven't.
None have come to the surface.
Two mutually exclusive points. The product with its technology and the installation (workmanship).
Same with any construction method.
That has nothing to do with the product and the technology behind it.
Same with any construction method. The Alaska failures were blantant negligence.
In know of whole areas thay were bulldozed.
Yep.
The point is the product, which seem to think is faulty by design. The product is sound, very sound.
You never, because you know little, if anything about SIPs. You make things up.
Where have you read that? Stop making things up.
I am not and I don't make things up.
Trained with low skills. Simple.
Not many at all.
Not so. Training is required of course, built no 5 year apprenticeships. If you knew how SIPs worked and were joined you would not say silly thing like that.
Not for me for everyone.
Tell me of all these horrendous problems? Please don't keep giving e.g's of shoddy workmanship.
That do just that. As do all independent test too. An the UK has a number of SIP companies manufacturing the panels, which was not the case 3 years ago.
Does pride mean some baked clay (bricks), light blocks and the rest Paramount boards? My oh my. The end result of SIPs is a house more solid and robust than bricks. The SIP houses in Kobe all survived the earthquakes with superficial damage while those around all fell down. You obviously know nothing of construction. That is sad.