I have recently been working on my toilet because of some simple
flapper leakage problems. While working on it, I decided to settle my
curiosity about how much water it took per flush. Much to my surprise
I found that it took 4 gallons of water to fill it to the usual flush
line! I wondered why my family was having such high water usage....
now I know why. Anyway, I have decided to change the toilet out for
a more efficient 1.5 gal model. What I would like to know is what do
you look for when buying one of these things. Also.... are they as
efficient in flushing as the one I presently have?? I noticed that
the price of toilets at Home Depot also ranged from about $75 to $300.
That is quite a range. What is the difference??
Thanks, Al Kondo
We replaced two of our toilets by American Standard "Champion" models
(approx. $250 at Lowe's or HD). They flush well, except that I guess
they don't swirl the water as well as a larger-volume toilet. The result
is that traces -- but only traces -- of really sticky "stuff" sometimes
remain on the sides of the bowl; they usually dissolve in the standing
water after a short time.
AFAIK, the difference between the cheaper ones and the more expensive
ones is that the more expensive have larger waterways, both from the
tank to the bowl and from the bowl to the drain. BTW, I've seen some at
Lowe's that are way more than $300, but I think you're paying for fancy
On 08/26/04 08:27 am Al Kondo put fingers to keyboard and launched the
following message into cyberspace:
Also look for a glazed trap - Its smoother internally and less likely to
clog. Kohler Wentworth is what I replace three toilets with. It works great
and didn't break the bank (About $100 if I remember correctly)
I fail to see any economy when you have to flush it three times to get all the
crap to go down. I've had better luck tricking mine to hold more water in the
tank. It's amazing how much better it flushes with even just another half a
gallon of water.
Frankly, I'd hold onto the old one if I could repair it economically. In this
case, newer isn't necessarily better.
I don't get it. First, water is cheap, $3 per 1000 gallons. Second,
there is no shortage of water in the world. Hydrocarbon combustion
constantly adds more. Most of the water is in polar ice and the oceans.
The Commonwealth of MA licenses each publically owned well for X many
gallons of water per day. THAT'S what causes the shortage!
True, but considering the energy required to constantly treat and purify
potable water, why waste it?
Lucky for you to live in an area with a good water treatment system and a
plentiful supply of drinkable water.
And, as such, isn't drinkable. You're quite right when you say that
there's plenty of water on the planet. Problem is, over 99% of it isn't
drinkable. What is drinkable (i.e. fresh water not salt water) requires
massive amounts of treatment to remove bacteria and other nasties before
it gets piped into homes. No sense wasting it, especially when low-flush
toilets are available that do a fine job of removing waste.
George Wenzel, B.A. (Criminology)
That'd get an F in the water treatment course I took getting my engineering
degree. The water gets treated - unless you know of a magical way to separate
the water from what's in it.
There's the cost of the pipes that have to be sized for the water, the
pumps, the filters...
That's nice, but it doesn't mean there's enough. There are places where
people are JUST BARELY able to get as much water as they need, which creates
very tense interactions with neighboring countries. Yeah....the water's
there somewhere, but some countries don't have the resources to get it where
it needs to be.
Right. Or, build a pipe line. Or, as the Shah or Iran was considering,
float icebergs from the polar regions and let them melt for fresh water.
Installing low-flush toilets is not going to help anybody.
Where you live is the whole world? _You_ may think that water
is cheap, but if you had to walk 5km each way to the nearest
well every day, you'd think that water was pretty expensive.
That's reality in some parts of the _real_ world.
What is the marginal cost of the next unit of clean water? If
waste increases, you have to come up with _new_ sources and new
infrastructure to process it. That is $$$
In parts of the US, there has been a permanent drawdown in the water
table. Hence the push to control overuse.
What you need to do is wake up and realize what's really happening
with water in this world. Canada and Russia have lots of water; most
of that is not where people live. Most other countries do not have
lots water. Get over it.
There is PLENTY of fresh water! God makes it all the time. If there are
people living in areas where there is no water, then you need to TELL THEM
I have all my faucets (including my outdoor ones!) running 24/7! I love to
hear the gurgling noise it makes as it goes down the drain!
Instead of worrying about a water shortage, why don't you just go hug a
tree! But don't do it too hard!! You might squeeze some moisture out of it,
and that would be wasting it, wouldn't it???
Please note that using water in a toilet does NOT "waste" it (pun!).
It is returned to nature where evaporation will separate it again,
forming rain, ... In fact withholding water from the environment is
how you create deserts! Use water. Enjoy life with out fear.
Yeah, right. It always rains in the same place that the water evaporates!
According to your fantasies, the US midwest water table should be the same
now as it was 100 years ago. It ain't. Guess what - water extracted in
one place may end up as rain somewhere else! Duh!
Only an idiot would propose cleaning up lots of sewage loaded water when
they can save money and time by only having to process a little.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.