Update on the treehouse bridge in the redwoods of the Santa Cruz mountains

Page 1 of 3  
Just to give you an update, the bridge was repaired after the last section fell down in the earlier Pineapple Express:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7478/15967080150_47ec573ed9_c.jpg
Those earlier storms took down a few nearby Monterey Pines, which decapitated the Internet access to the bridge & the temporary power:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8598/15849592893_9ce3aaedc1_b.jpg
We had to restring the Internet access in addition to the electrical lines running for hundreds of feet along the forest floor:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7285/16468720772_94afb91b3e_c.jpg
We also had to detach the bridge from the support at the smaller redwood trees (which are, themselves, at least 100 feet tall), but we added a swinging cable, to take some of the load off the cables:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8574/16283420079_f955d6e1ec_c.jpg
Now the bridge is almost at the large redwood tree, almost 100 feet from the starting point, and now 16 feet wide, instead of the original 10 feet wide for most of the length of the cable bridge:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7426/16283419909_20257e7858_c.jpg
Here is an underside view of the bridge (I can't fit the whole thing into a single picture because it's too long from the ground looking up):
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8642/16467929211_01972b0444_c.jpg
Here's a side view (again, the hillside being what it is, I can't get the whole thing into a single picture):
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7460/16443668456_56a6f74fab_b.jpg
Each section is 16 feet long, by 10 feet wide, and hung on the 3/8" steel cable for support, and I'd say we're about 30 to 40 feet up:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8598/16281975618_2c7e455b86_b.jpg
We still use the cargo net, slung between the trees, in order to go back and forth to the big anchoring tree at the far end:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7303/16283420189_5e15a30cd9_c.jpg
We only have about 8 feet to go, and we'll be at the big tree, and ready to start building the two-story treehouse, which, in the end, will include running water, electricity, Internet, etc.
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7350/16283421279_b0aeced5d3_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Lots of work. I live in the redwoods in Fort Bragg. I have had thoughts of one special tree, and getting to the height where I can see the ocean.... It is still a dream though. John
"Danny D." wrote in message
Just to give you an update, the bridge was repaired after the last section fell down in the earlier Pineapple Express:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7478/15967080150_47ec573ed9_c.jpg
Those earlier storms took down a few nearby Monterey Pines, which decapitated the Internet access to the bridge & the temporary power:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8598/15849592893_9ce3aaedc1_b.jpg
We had to restring the Internet access in addition to the electrical lines running for hundreds of feet along the forest floor:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7285/16468720772_94afb91b3e_c.jpg
We also had to detach the bridge from the support at the smaller redwood trees (which are, themselves, at least 100 feet tall), but we added a swinging cable, to take some of the load off the cables:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8574/16283420079_f955d6e1ec_c.jpg
Now the bridge is almost at the large redwood tree, almost 100 feet from the starting point, and now 16 feet wide, instead of the original 10 feet wide for most of the length of the cable bridge:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7426/16283419909_20257e7858_c.jpg
Here is an underside view of the bridge (I can't fit the whole thing into a single picture because it's too long from the ground looking up):
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8642/16467929211_01972b0444_c.jpg
Here's a side view (again, the hillside being what it is, I can't get the whole thing into a single picture):
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7460/16443668456_56a6f74fab_b.jpg
Each section is 16 feet long, by 10 feet wide, and hung on the 3/8" steel cable for support, and I'd say we're about 30 to 40 feet up:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8598/16281975618_2c7e455b86_b.jpg
We still use the cargo net, slung between the trees, in order to go back and forth to the big anchoring tree at the far end:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7303/16283420189_5e15a30cd9_c.jpg
We only have about 8 feet to go, and we'll be at the big tree, and ready to start building the two-story treehouse, which, in the end, will include running water, electricity, Internet, etc.
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7350/16283421279_b0aeced5d3_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 04:55:14 +0000 (UTC), "Danny D."

Is all of this subject to local building codes? Seems to me somebody is going to end up dead from a long fall.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Vic Smith wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 08:49:38 -0600:

It's my understanding that the local building codes do not pertain to tree houses.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

does your insurance cover it. Like when your buddy takes a header?
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Pico Rico wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 08:01:33 -0800:

You'll notice our "insurance" consists of lots of safety lines.
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7403/16449145806_c736e4cb9d_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Oren wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 08:21:15 -0800:

That's a good idea, to get 'em off the payroll, before they hit the ground.
Most of the neighbors have been pitching in, so, that's a large payroll to downsize quickly.
Here's a view of the way down from the end closest to the big redwood:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7299/16449146666_cc1f90346c_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Saturday, February 7, 2015 at 9:55:54 PM UTC-7, Danny D. wrote:

Danny, I don't wish you any bad luck and you certainly are determined to co mplete your project BUT it will be for naught. Mother nature will get you a gain. You really need some consulting engineers to finish the "project" bef ore it goes down again. If your trees never moved it would be a different s tory but the variables are against you.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Roy wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 09:22:32 -0800:

What? You're not our consulting engineers? I have proof that we consulted you, and everyone here! :)
To your point, the trees did move in the last Pineapple Express which caused the last slung section to crumple to the ground:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8681/16154396265_99274620db_c.jpg
It also caused the wood to split in a couple of places:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7335/16281975518_bff97f9956_b.jpg
We determined it was, as you said, because the small trees moved, so, we detached the bridge from the small redwoods in the middle:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8657/16467930481_1d7505afd3_b.jpg
Now the bridge is no longer attached in the center, to the small redwoods to either side of the 10-foot-wide section:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7390/16473409901_ddbd3907b2_b.jpg
One other problem is that the bridge "bent" in the middle; but we'll plan to resolve that when we do the final leveling:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7369/15855045413_bf329e8091_b.jpg
We only have about 8 feet to go, and then we can walk from ground level, to something like 30 or 40 feet up, over about 75 feet of length, and be flat and level the entire distance:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8647/16443668356_137c0b7fba_b.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Sun, 8 Feb 2015 04:55:14 +0000 (UTC), "Danny D."

Don't all those trees sway (asynchronously!) in the wind?
You could occasionally get the equivalent of a rogue wave, a big spike of acceleration.
--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing laser drivers and controllers
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
John Larkin wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 09:39:53 -0800:

I'm not sure how they sway in the wind, but, we decoupled the 75-foot long bridge from the middle trees after that last storm, and we're hoping to see the bridge still there after the one that is raging as we type.
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7394/16449145896_d0b70b7c5d_c.jpg
One thing we noticed is that, in the wind, the bridge actually *rises* a few inches, like what happens with an airplane wing or a sailboat sail.
Since the bottom is dirtier, with respect to laminar flow, we suspect the air flows faster over the top than over the bottom:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8647/16443668356_137c0b7fba_b.jpg
The whole bridge is roughly the size of an airplane wing:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8642/16467929211_01972b0444_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Bob F wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 13:02:33 -0800:

The Tacoma Narrows bridge is nothing like this, in length, anyway. But, your point is well taken.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

It's called flutter in aerodynamics. This is what happens when the frequency of the aeolian tone matches the deck-twist resonant frequency.
When it happens to an airplane wing, the airplane is usually lost. Look at some of the film clips.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroelasticity#Flutter>
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQI3AWpTWhM

<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fl2Ei7lubrE&list=PL2PSucAZiYkfdJzm_UaYq
vWwY4xeR7hil&index=7>
One can greatly reduce the effect by spacing the boards apart by say an inch, which will equalize the pressure. The world is full of rope bridges over chasms, erected by people who never heard of aerodynamics.
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolian_harp>
The whole idea of rigid decks spanning flexible trees seems destined to fail.
Joe Gwinn
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Joe Gwinn wrote, on Sun, 08 Feb 2015 18:32:00 -0500:

We're currently using a Philips screwdriver blade as the spacer between boards.
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7338/16292599559_4b2c0d8465_c.jpg
Maybe we should use something thicker. This is a great idea, which I will share with the bridge owner.
Thanks!
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 02:41:07 +0000, Danny D. wrote:

You mean a philips screwdriver shank?
Get a number three. Some of them are square shank, even more "precise". And they are certainly bigger.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno wrote, on Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:02:42 +0000:

Yes. Sorry. Shank.
Actually, truth be admitted, the first two sections were perfectly aligned, but, the next two "curved" a bit, due to the difficulties of getting every board lined up straight while being hung from the cables, so, at times, it's a screwdriver shank on the right side, but an inch (or so) on the left.
Looking up from below, you can see that these third and fourth 16-foot sections have a larger board-to-board spacing on the right than on the left:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8632/16287716260_ab60268c0b_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:11:29 +0000, Danny D. wrote:

"We want to splay... just a little bit longer..." --Jackson Browne

snip
Arc of the Boardament. Just think of railroad tracks.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I am still wondering about the overall width of such a bridge. I would think, that a smaller width would be stronger, and lighter, and still manage to carry one over with parts and pieces to the actual tree house. just a few thoughts.... john
"Danny D." wrote in message
Just to give you an update, the bridge was repaired after the last section fell down in the earlier Pineapple Express:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7478/15967080150_47ec573ed9_c.jpg
Those earlier storms took down a few nearby Monterey Pines, which decapitated the Internet access to the bridge & the temporary power:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8598/15849592893_9ce3aaedc1_b.jpg
We had to restring the Internet access in addition to the electrical lines running for hundreds of feet along the forest floor:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7285/16468720772_94afb91b3e_c.jpg
We also had to detach the bridge from the support at the smaller redwood trees (which are, themselves, at least 100 feet tall), but we added a swinging cable, to take some of the load off the cables:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8574/16283420079_f955d6e1ec_c.jpg
Now the bridge is almost at the large redwood tree, almost 100 feet from the starting point, and now 16 feet wide, instead of the original 10 feet wide for most of the length of the cable bridge:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7426/16283419909_20257e7858_c.jpg
Here is an underside view of the bridge (I can't fit the whole thing into a single picture because it's too long from the ground looking up):
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8642/16467929211_01972b0444_c.jpg
Here's a side view (again, the hillside being what it is, I can't get the whole thing into a single picture):
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7460/16443668456_56a6f74fab_b.jpg
Each section is 16 feet long, by 10 feet wide, and hung on the 3/8" steel cable for support, and I'd say we're about 30 to 40 feet up:
https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8598/16281975618_2c7e455b86_b.jpg
We still use the cargo net, slung between the trees, in order to go back and forth to the big anchoring tree at the far end:
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7303/16283420189_5e15a30cd9_c.jpg
We only have about 8 feet to go, and we'll be at the big tree, and ready to start building the two-story treehouse, which, in the end, will include running water, electricity, Internet, etc.
https://c4.staticflickr.com/8/7350/16283421279_b0aeced5d3_c.jpg
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On 2/7/2015 10:55 PM, Danny D. wrote:

Sorry to see the work being done over - and such. We used to live on Hwy 9 off Glengary. Had about 100 of the sprouts that came up after the clear cut making lumber for SFO. Mine were between 100 and 130 feet When we left in 2006. Kinda miss the place. Now I have large oaks and tall pines.
Martin
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 9:10:43 PM UTC-7, Martin Eastburn wrote:

:

Believe me, Danny will be doing it over many, many times 'cause unless he i s a spider that walkway will not endure. Perhaps if he made a playhouse sus pended over the side of the mountain, it might work out for him. He could use a ladder or stairway down to the playhouse. Maybe even a cave in the si de of the mountain like the Indians of Arizona created. =========
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Related Threads

    HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.