On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:46:29 -0700, jim beam wrote:
When I told Angus at CARB (916-445-4686) earlier today
that the air resource board specifications were only
for keeping the gas *in* the can, nobody allowed for the
gas to come *out*, he just laughed good naturedly. He's
heard it all. There was nothing I was going to tell him
about the spout or the spills or the slowness of the gas
coming out that he hadn't heard before.
He *was* unaware of the flaw where a concentric ring cracks
on the Blitz spouts (it happened to three of my cans); but
he said CARB doesn't get warranty information from the
So, I have to agree with you that they need to rethink
a) They've gotten the gas to stay *in* rather well;
b) Now it's time for them to mandate the gas come *out*!
Or a freakin' brain!
Neither my wife nor I are klutzes but I'll guarantee you that we've both
spilled more gasoline than would have escaped as vapor using the old
style cans. We kept the vents closed and the cans capped unless we were
actually pouring gasoline.
On Mon, 20 May 2013 11:51:30 +0000, Doug Miller wrote:
What they really need are consumer use-model specifications.
They have mandated that the gas stays in the can. That's half the spec.
Now they need to mandate that a consumer can get the gas *out* of the can!
Just take the damned thing off and use a funnel... seriously.
The nozzle is damn near worthless, a simple screw-off cap would be more
practical, less likely to break, and would make it more clear to the end
user how to actually get the gasoline out of the stupid thing.
replace "roosters" with "cox" to reply.
On Mon, 13 May 2013 20:24:00 -0400, Nate Nagel wrote:
I agree 100%.
Based on the spout information from Steve W., I just sent an email to
email@example.com (EZPourSpout, 18451 Centaur Road, Wildwood MO
63005) asking if they sell a plain flat one-piece gas cap.
I'll also call them tomorrow at 573-751-2783, and 866-223-6535 to ask
the same question. (Blitz USA never returned my calls or emails.)
A plain gas cap would solve all the practical problems inherent in the
Blitz USA gasoline cans & would still meet CARB & EPA standards:
a) A cap would hold the gasoline inside the can until needed
b) A cap could have the same child-proof lock features as does the spout!
c) A cap would prevent accidental spills even better than the spout!
The advantage of the simple one-piece gas cap would be that it then gets
out of the way when you actually need to pour or siphon the gasoline.
Personally, I siphon the 5 gallon cans into a vehicle and pour the 2
gallon cans into a funnel; but in both cases, I have no need for anything
more than a simple flat one-piece gas cap.
Anyone know a source of plain gas caps for Blitz USA gasoline cans?
Called CARB at 800-242-4450 and was transferred to Angus at
916-445-4686 who discussed with me the legality of gas caps:
Angus says that the cans aren't tested in the sun, but the
"system" is certified for permeability after 140 days in an
enclosure or after an accelerated 30-day test at 100 degrees F.
It seemed to him that gas cap 'should' easily meet those
permeability requirements, as long as it's made of similar
Angus said the cap must hold the ~13 psi above atmospheric
Reid Vapor Pressure of California winter formulation gasoline
(which has a higher vapor pressure than summer formulations);
but that RVP & permeability requirement seems easy enough for
a gas cap of the same material as the current spout.
In addition, the spout must be spill proof and child proof;
but again, those requirements would be met by use of a cap.
The only requirement of the spout that the cap can't meet
is the auto-shutoff requirement; but if the cap is used just
for storage, then that requirement wouldn't be applicable.
Interestingly, Angus said there is a provision in the specs
for a "secondary opening" (e.g., a vent!); but he said none
of the cans certified for California have opted for that
Angus said these 5 manufacturers are certified in California:
1. The Plastics Group
4. Great Outdoor Products
Of those manufacturers, the first three have the lions share of
sales in California, according to Angus, and the first is the
one he thinks who bought the Blitz operation in July of 2012.
That explains why I can't get a hold of anyone at Blitz
to affirm the threads on the gas can caps. I'll work on
The Plastics Group next, to see if they sell just the gas caps.
Q: Anyone have a 411 on "The Plastics Group"?
On Tue, 14 May 2013 18:20:55 +0000, Danny D wrote:
Apparently Angus was right in that Blitz ceased operations:
And, Hopkins Manufacturing technical support was right when they
told me they bought everything *but* the gas can manufacturing.
Blitz was spending about 3 million dollars a year in lawsuits,
mostly for the gas cans not having flame arrestors built in.
---- cut here for verbatim press release ---
MIAMI, OKLA. (June 13, 10:15 a.m. ET) —
Plastic fuel-can molder Blitz USA Inc. will shut operations after
unsuccessfully trying to reorganize under Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection since Nov. 9, according to a company statement issued June 12.
The July 31 shutdown will affect 117 employees at Blitz’s manufacturing
plant in Miami, Okla.
The firm plans to liquidate all assets either en masse or piecemeal,
external affairs manager Amanda Emerson said in a telephone interview.
“We appreciate the support of our employees and their families in their
efforts to reorganize and develop a viable business plan,” said Blitz
President Rocky Flick, according to an article in the Joplin (Missouri)
Globe. “Unfortunately, we were not able to address the costs of the
increased litigation associated with our fuel-containment products.”
In April, Blitz sold its F3Brands LLC business, a major in oil drains and
other associated auto products, in a bankruptcy auction sale to Hopkins
Manufacturing Corp. of Emporia, Kan. Court documents stated Blitz netted
$14.6 million from the sale, which it applied to secured debt.
Blitz has been facing a storm of lawsuits blaming its products for
consumer injuries caused by fires. The firm spent some $30 million
defending itself in product liability suits and owes $3.5 million in
legal fees, Blitz reported in court documents.
Blitz’s decision to sell its assets is subject to approval by bankruptcy
court. It sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.,
a major retailer of Blitz gas cans, also faces lawsuits.
Blitz has been the dominant producer of plastic gas cans in the United
States and claimed 75 percent of the market.
“Other manufacturers face similar uncertainty — putting the industry’s
ability to meet the typical spike in demand driven by storms in serious
jeopardy,” Blitz stated in a news release.
In the week of June 4 the Portable Fuel Container Manufacturers
Association began alerting consumers in hurricane-prone states of a
potential product shortage, which increases public safety risk. In times
of disaster, consumers rely on portable fuel supplies to operate
electricity generators, vehicles, chain saws and other relief equipment.
PFCMA’s legal office is in Sacramento, Calif.
PFCMA has said congressional intervention is needed to stabilize the
business environment so PFCMA group members can continue supplying the
products necessary for safely transporting and storing gasoline and
“While it is now too late to save Blitz, adoption of mandatory safety
standards could convince others to invest in expanded operations,” the
Blitz news release stated.
PFCMA has criticized the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission for
twice refusing to mandate fuel-can safety standards because it claims
that harmful incidences were the result of misuse of the fuel cans rather
than a product issue.
Fuel-can producers have adopted voluntarily standards developed by the
American Society for Testing and Materials since the 1980s. The standards
include container stability and heat resistance, openings and closings,
filling and pouring, drop strength, permeability and cautionary labeling.
Labeling, for example, states that gasoline should never be used to start
or accelerate a fire. Much litigation resulted from such misuse of the
fuel in the containers.
U.S. consumers buy more than 15 million portable fuel cans each year, but
that number rises by 30 percent when hurricanes make landfall.
“If gas cans aren’t available, disaster victims will still be
transporting and storing fuel, but at much greater risk to themselves and
everyone around them,” Blitz stated.
Blitz President and CEO Rocky Flick said the sale process for the Miami
assets could take three months.
Other PFCMA members include Midwest Can Co. of Melrose Park, Ill.; No-
Spill Inc. of Lenexa, Kan.; Scepter Corp. of Scarborough, Ontario; and
the Plastics Group Inc. of Willowbrook, Ill.
“Blitz was very good at what they did,” said Tom Cray, president of No-
Spill. “The legal system is what brought them down. Blitz exported around
the world and only here [in the United States] were there lawsuits.”
I have one of these idiotic gas cans. I hate the damn thing with a
passion, but until I find a replacement older style can at a garage sale
or auction, I'm stuck with it. The other night I went to town after
dark. I needed some gas for my tractor, and I put about 4 gallons in
the 5 gal can, and placed it in the bed of my pickup truck, being sure
to tie it to the truck rail so it dont tip over and possibly spill. Gas
it too damn expensive to spill these days.
I got home late and was damn tired, so I went to sleep without putting
the gas can in the shed. The next day was hot and sunny with temps well
over 90 deg. Around noon I walked past my truck and noticed the gas can
had ballooned out. The can was so bloated it was actually round, and
was rocking back and forth from myself leaning against the truck. Only
the twine I used to tie it kept it from falling over. I released the
lever and a huge amount of gas smelling air came out. Even after
allowing all the air to escape, the can was still rounded. I then put
the can in the shed. Today the weather was cooler and when I went to
get the gas can, it had gone the other way, now it was all sucked
Those valves apparently do seal well, maybe too well. I wonder how much
longer that can would have held the huge amount of pressure inside of
it, sitting in the hot sun, before rupturing. And if I had not tied it,
it would have tipped over, because it was only the twine that held it
Somehow this does not seem safe. If the temperature had been higher,
I'm afraid it would have blown up. There needs to be some sort of
pressure relief on them, or KABOOM!
So much for government safety!
On Thu, 16 May 2013 01:08:11 -0500, repairs wrote:
While I agree with you that they blow up like a balloon, which
makes them tip over easily, I don't think they'll ever actually
explode from the 13 psi above atmospheric vapor pressure inside.
If you didn't see it, here's a picture I had posted of my 5-gallon
Blitz gasoline can where I took two cans from the shaded shed, and
put one in the sun, and the other next to it, in the shade, for
ten minutes ... look what happened:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 01:08:11 -0500, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote in
may be dangerous and explode:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's publication "AP-42:
Compilation of Air Pollution Emission Factors", Chapter 7, Table
7.1-2, publishes the True vapor pressures (in psia) for gasolines
having Reid Vapor Pressures of 7.
That Table 7.1-2 is at:
Extracted from the table
deg F: 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100
psi: 7.8, 8.3, 10, 11.5, 13, 13.5 and 15.
In your case the temp of the can was probably well over 100F so the
internal pressure was well over 15psi.
I use gasoline to clean bearings before repacking. Just a little in a
Much of the gasoline NEVER evaporates. just a one inch deep sluge
remains 3 weeks later.
i have tried using bearing cleaner without much success.......
its a big job getting to them, and i dont want to have to do the job
again because all the crud wasnt removed....
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.