On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 3:09:23 PM UTC-4, snipped-for-privacy@snyder.on.ca wr ote:
At this sub panel I have tapped into the main supply lugs to run a feed to another sub panel that is 3 feet from the first sub panel . The 2nd sub pa nel is one breaker supplied for a hot tub at 30 amps ...Wire size and break ers is not in dispute, what a home inspector stated was to tap from the mai n lugs was not ok I should have used a junction connection some were else o ther than the lug connections there was plenty of room in each lug connecto r and they tightened correctly and all the wiring passed , in dispute is th e method of connection for the 2nd sub panel. I had been told by a "electri cian" that junction connections simply have to be contained and were it is connected it certainly is contained .Any thoughts?
Not sure that you understand what he says he has:
"I have a sub panel that is on a 30 amp breaker feed from the main panel. A t this sub panel I have tapped into the main supply lugs to run a feed to a nother sub panel that is 3 feet from the first sub panel . The 2nd sub pane l is one breaker supplied for a hot tub at 30 amps ."
My translation of that is he has a main panel with a 30A breaker that feeds a subpanel, call it "B". AT that B panel, there is a tap at the main supply lugs which feeds to another panel for the SPA, call that the SPA panel. This is nuts, IMO. There is only a 30A breaker supplying subpanel B and the SPA panel? It would seem a typical SPA is 30A plus by itself. What other loads/breakers are in in Panel B?
Aside from that I'm in agreement that it would seem it's only NEC compliant if Panel B is listed for two wires under those lugs.