:) >
:) > :) Hint: Pyrethrin's one of the safest "cides" around. But, the :) "carrier" - the :) > :) so called inert ingredients in pesticides - they haven't been subject :) to :) > :) testing since the late 1960s or early 1970s. :) >
:) >
:) > ?????? Here is the EPA site, updated Jan 2004, of the lists for inert :) > materials allowed to be used in pest control products. :) >
formatting link
>
:) :) Very nice web site you provided. You should read it. :) :) You must be very young. You've missed 20 years' worth of knowledge. It's not :) nice to gamble with the health of your children and their children. Here are :) a few resources for your enlightenment: :) :) " Inert ingredients, on the other hand, were not subject to testing :) requirements until 1987.(7) The requirements for health and safety testing :) of inerts which EPA established at that time were called "minimal"(7) even :) by EPA. They did not include tests for the following serious hazards:(7) :) a.. the ability to cause cancer :) a.. the ability to adversely affect fertility and reproduction :) a.. the ability to damage the nervous system :) No tests at all were required of inerts already in use in 1987; testing :) requirements apply only to inerts first used in pesticides since that :) date.(7) :) Just questioning the statement you painted insinuating no testing has been done on inerts since the 60's when in fact several category listings are kept by the EPA, with evaluation of many being an ongoing process. By just the fact that a tolerance exemption may be granted under the FQPA, passage in 1996, suggests that ongoing monitoring/testing must be going on.
Lar. (to e-mail, get rid of the BUGS!!
It is said that the early bird gets the worm, but it is the second mouse that gets the cheese.