single handle faucet versus two faucets?

My kitchen faucet broke. Time to shop for new kitchen faucet.

Single handle faucets for both hot and cold water are convenient. But apparently people still buy two separate faucets. Why? What is the pros and cons?

Reply to
peter
Loading thread data ...

Personal preference driven by aesthetics or familiarity.

They're both outdated anyway.

formatting link
R

Reply to
RicodJour

Reminds me of the old two-handed LED watches where you had to push a button to tell the time. Now you have to use your hand and foot to get water... presumably because those hand valves are just too damn inconvenient.

I'm a one-handle man in the kitchen, two in the bath, and only 8" models there. -----

- gpsman

Reply to
gpsman

what a coon rig.

Reply to
Steve Barker

anyway.http://www.pedalvalve.com/Residential%20Page.html>

You've obviously never used one and you haven't given the idea much thought to make a comment like that. Do I really need to point out the hygienic factor? Silly people who like to waste time, like medical personnel, have been using them for years. They have also been standard in parts of Europe for years - notably public restrooms. I'd also hazard a guess that you're not the one who washes dishes in your house. Being able to turn the water on and off while your hands are full is obviously an advantage. Unless, of course, you miss the days of hand brakes in cars...

You don't need to touch the faucet with foot operated pedals unless you want to adjust the water temperature, and some of them let you adjust temperature with your feet as well. Considering that 90% of the time I like the water at a specific temperature anyway, what's the bother?

R
Reply to
RicodJour

Actually, I could see it being useful when rinsing dishes, filling large pots, or washing hands after handling raw meat.

However, it costs several hundred bucks for the cheap one, and over $500 for the fancy version.

Too rich for my blood.

Chris

Reply to
Chris Friesen

I don't know that term, and I have no idea what you are trying to say. English is the preferred language of communication on this newsgroup. Revise and resubmit. Thanks.

R
Reply to
RicodJour

anyway.http://www.pedalvalve.com/Residential%20Page.html> >

Hey, Chris, I was just posting the first one that popped up in my search - I wasn't doing your shopping for you!

Here's one that's ~ $250. and has more features.

formatting link
R

Reply to
RicodJour

Separate faucets are less complicated than single types, and can be presumed to have a longer service life. If repairability is an issue, the separate types win because of the design. It is possible that single types can be repaired, but those in my house were always terminal from wear or corrosion and usually replaced by duals. I've got some Kohler units that are going on 20 years old now that have only needed an occasional washer replacement on the hot water side. YMMV of course.

Joe

Reply to
Joe

Yeah, I guess you do. Unless we are to presume everybody most often wishes for the same water temperature. What I consider hot Ms. gpsman considers too hot.

Medical personnel can set their hot water heater/s to a lower temperature than the average homeowner and use straight hot, and more often than not outside the operating room use extended handles that can be operated with elbows, for a hell of a lot less money, and with far fewer complication/s.

Well that's a slam-dunk selling point. Whatever is standard in Yurropeein public restrooms is what I want in my home.

Nice analogy...

Here in the gpsmanland we suffer the ultimate inconvenience of setting the dishes down before turning on the water. When I think of what I might accomplished with my life using the saved time...

I most often want to adjust the water temperature, and pressure, and I don't need additional steps (pardon), nor the option to do so with my feet.

I don't know. Can you set the specific water temperature, or is adjustment necessary?

Seriously though, I have considered it. Considered adapting and/or marketing the hospital-type units for home use, a couple decades ago. After considerable thought I dismissed the idea as impractical, on many levels. -----

- gpsman

Reply to
gpsman

My cat's would have fun with that one. I would hate to think of my water bill.

Reply to
Joseph Meehan

Your cats need to go on a diet. ;)

R
Reply to
RicodJour

Personally I think it's a matter of personal taste. We replaced our sink and tap last fall and went with a two handle faucet replacing the single faucet that was there. Why? We thought it looked better.

PV

Reply to
PV

Does it stay on only when your foot is on the pedal, or does the pedal turn it on and then off?

Eitehr way has advantages and disadvantages, and all in all, I'm happy with the typical single handle faucet.

Two handles for the bath, just like the other guy said.

Reply to
mm

I certainly prefer the convenience of the single handle faucet. Good quality ones are expensive, however. The previous owner of my house splashed out $500 on a Grohe and I love it. Looks good, silky smooth operation and absolutely no problems.

If you're on a tight budget, the cheap two-handle faucets are likely to given less trouble than the cheap single-handle faucets.

Reply to
Malcolm Hoar

Cool idea, frees up both hands

but I would expect much resistance from most folks...."too clinical"

No temperature adjustment by foot pedal.....just on / off.

Still I could have water with a lot less effort while shaving

however I doubt I could get "interior design" approval for installation on a pedestal sink. :)

cheers Bob

Reply to
BobK207

That's the way construction is - and for good reason. If you're an early adopter, you're the test subject. When it's your house, or your customers complaining, that's no fun. The foot pedals are old technology in Europe and hospitals, so there's nothing really new there.

The second link I posted had a more involved operator. Electronically controlled with separate hot and cold switches - hit both for warm.

I really wish they'd put them in public bathrooms everywhere and have sensor doors so I wouldn't have to touch the skivy door handles.

Tell 'er it's the new code. I'll back you up. ;)

R
Reply to
RicodJour

Reply to
Michael B

I have the motion sensing (battery operated) add on unit to the existing faucet. It only takes a minute to install but require to change the batteries every 6 months. A hard wired motion sensing unit would be even better, like in the public bathrooms, but require a new motion sensing faucet and a 120V outlet under the sink. Most kitchen already have 120V outlets under the sinks. Short kids and people in wheelchairs may have a problem operating the pedalvalve.

Anyway, when I come out of my shop or garden both of my hands are usually dirty so a touchless faucet is nice. The only problem is the preset pressure and temperature, I'll guess the next generation is voice command to adjust those.

Reply to
Jack

Just read the entire thread and it wasn't mentioned.

I vote for single handle even in the bath if they can be had for a reasonable price. Why?

I dearly hate trying to clean around those two handles on a sink. Seems almost impossible to get into some of the nooks and crannies. When we redid our bath the missus picked out a very fancy, stylish set of faucets...until, that is, I mentioned the problem of keeping them clean. Still wound up with two handle but at least simple design.

I appears to me that designers and interior decorators must never do any cleaning. Worst I saw was in a "yuppie" magazine proudly showing a bath design. Shower was beautiful - pebbles (as in marble size) covering the shower wall.

Harry K

Reply to
Harry K

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.