There has been a recent discussion about work shoes. This is about shoes in
I just want to say that I have bought good shoes. Yes, I have bought some
cheap ones for special purposes, but by and large, I buy good shoes.
I have had some for twenty years. Florsheims, French Shriners, Bert
Pulitzer, some Italian brands, mostly the leather dress ones. For work
right now, I have some Red Wings and Magnums, and some cold weather LaCross
with good insulation. For cowboy boots, I love Lucchese. Tennies, I like
New Balance cross trainers, and Merrell slipons.
I used to get a new pair of high dollar running shoes about every six months
when I was parking cars in Las Vegas.
Question is, do you buy good shoes or cheap ones if you have the choice?
I've told young whippersnappers, "I've got shoes that are older than you" on
more than one occasion, and it was true.
In my experience, good shoes last, and they are good for your feet, legs,
I've bought only one pair of cheap shoes in my life and never will again.
Cheap shoes can be very expensive.
My shoe requirements are simple as I dress casual at work and rarely wear
dress shoes. Biggest problem is finding wide widths so now I stick the the
store and brands readily available. I do replace or repair them as soon as
needed too. Worn shoes can be very harmful to your back.
No cheap shoes but no expensive ones either. My feet have actually
grown from size 9 to 10 1/2 over the years and I've had to throw away a
lot of safety shoes I got for free at work. Retired, I don't need fancy
shoes but still have a few pairs of steel toed safety shoes (20 years
old) that I wear when I need to dress up ;)
I concur with your opinion that good shoes are worth the money.
As someone who also has wide feet (EEEE), I used to be an avid customer of
Red Wing shoes until they discontinued the wide widths and generally
downgraded their quality.
I can recommend Hitchcock as someone I have done business with in the past
and anticipate doing business with in the future.
Y'know I guess I have been very lucky... I hear people saying the right
shoes make the difference... However, I don't think I have worn a 'Decent "
pair of shoes in my life..Other than dress shoes for church, weddings and
funerals, but thats about it....... I work in the oil industry and am a
very active person... I am a pipeline welder and Steve I know you are a
welder also by reading your earlier posts...... When I go to work...I buy
work boots that fit for a decent price..not any fancy name brand boot.... I
can walk on a cement floor for 12 hr shifts and be in fine form at the end
of the day where other workers are complaining about aches and pains from
walking all day on cement floors...I just don't get any of that...
On my days off I wander around in a pair of 10 dollar velcro
type runners. On nice days I take 3-4 mile walks with my wife. (Wife has
back problems and swears by expensive shoes). I generally wear out two-three
pairs of cheap runners in a summer... It's great when we go hiking and
fishing or gardening because if I happen to step in the mud I am not worried
about messing up an expensive pair of shoes...LOL
The only thing I did have happen to me, was once I was
wearing an ill fitting 2 dollar pair of flip flops and I tripped while going
down the stairs and actually broke my neck 3 years ago...
I did buy a good pair of leather sandals for about 40 bucks last
year and they are quite comfortable (no more flip flops lol)... I have no
back problems or aches and pains at all... I'm 51 years young....... I feel
great... So In my experience, just staying in shape will be good for your
feet, legs and back...not standing around in a pair of expensive shoes...
My brother says he needs good shoes... but he is
about 80 lbs overweight and wears those good shoes in front of the TV set
with a bag of chips.
I'm not trying to discredit you Steve on wearing nice
shoes... I just don't think "everybody" needs them ...... Again...I'm not
sending this to offend... Jim.
There's a differenc between "nice" and quality. I good pair of
Florsheim wing-tips will last forever cuz they are quality and, these
days, one seldom wears them 'cept maybe to wedding and funerals.
Quality is a whole nother ballgame. Paying good money for good work
shoes pays off in the end, namely your health. Sure, when you're
young you can wear crap. But, eventually the "crap" will catch up
with you in foot and back problems. What's your feet and spine
(plant) construction... Am a scuba diver also but never done any
construction work. I was accepted in Senaca College in King City Ontario
(just outside Toronto) to take commercial diving instruction and underwater
welding but did not go...... Have worked through the Arctic in the Beaufort
Sea (Tuktoyaktuk) right through to Alberta oil sands...Jim
I went to commercial diving school in Houston in 1974. I had the choice to
go to the Alaskan oilfields or the Gulf of Mexico. The Gulf sounded warmer.
I got into welding after some years of diving. There was not a lot of
underwater "welding" AT THAT TIME, but I understand great strides have been
made. Mostly, we did electric arc CUTTING. I did get to work on some
diving jobs related to welding, including the Bannister Week's Island
Strategic Salt Dome Reserve, and was on the largest ocean going lay barge in
the world at that time, the BAR282 for Brown and Root. That was 90 miles of
54" OD pipe through the Atchafalaya swamp. We did hundreds of miles of
smaller pipe in the Gulf.
You have a tough job. Stay safe.
Before Ralph Nader got out of the Army, he bought several pairs of Army
shoes because they were good and they were cheap.
The footwear of American Indians was completely inadequate by European
standards, but the Indians could walk farther and faster and didn't seem
to have foot problems.
The feet and back need walking. They weren't designed for prolonged
standing. If whites needed special footwear, it could be because many
stood longer and walked less than Indians.
Feet need room, for bones to grow and work, for blood circulation to
regulate temperature, and to keep the skin healthy. Shoes are often
tight, because big feet are considered unattractive or to make
cumbersome shoes feel agile. A habit of prolonged standing or tight
shoes could change the feet so that only certain shoes are adequate.
Army shoes had leather soles. This made them fairly light and flexible
so that one could walk in them all day. They "breathed" so well that
they could leave condensation on a floor where somebody had stood a
couple of minutes. Still, the leather could be slippery, it didn't last
as long as many rubber soles, and it would absorb water from wet
pavement. Whether a shoe is good or bad depends on your requirements.
Compared to Army and Air Force boots, Marine boots of the 1960s reminded
me of moccasins. They were simple, flexible, and roomy, hanging from
the ankles. The roominess made them comfortable over many miles and
long hours. For all-day comfort, wearing dress socks under work socks
probably mattered more than the details of boot construction; it reduced
friction and perspiration.
At an online retailer I often find shoes at 50-75% off because only a
few sizes are left. It seems that those made to sell for $100 are not
necessarily better than those made to sell for $30.
Shoes can cause chafing on top of toes or at ankles; I've had more
trouble with the expensive ones. They can be tighter than other shoes
of the same size; I've had more trouble with the expensive ones.
Moisture accumulation can be a problem regardless of price. Regardless
of price, the tread design can bring mud or grit indoors.
Shoes that feel light often have voids in the soles, like egg cartons.
As they break in, the soles seem to mold themselves to the foot. The
insulation is good, and the design may help dissipate moisture.
However, those voids tend to cave in eventually. It can happen soon and
unevenly, making the support lopsided and hazardous to health.
Polyurethane soles can insulate so well that you get static shocks when
humidity is low. This can cause pain, damage to electronics, and
explosions when pumping gasoline. Chemicals can be added so that
polyurethane will drain static, but most manufacturers don't bother.
Slipping on a wet surface is a common way to die or be seriously
injured. It's hard for a consumer to predict how treacherous a given
sole material will be on a set surface. Tires have to have to be rated
for wet traction. Why don't shoes?
My cheapest shoes cost $10 at a local store. They feel heavy. The fit
over the instep is sloppy enough that I can remove them without untying
them. They tend to get damp in the toe. However, they don't slow my
walk and can be comfortable over several miles. They wear out
moderately slowly, and they are adequately warm in a house where the
floor is 55F. Best of all, their traction on wet, sealed concrete is
better than anything else I have. When one pair wore out, I bought another.
You were a podiatrist for 19th century Native Americans?
If you got standard D width off-the-shelf feet, by all means, buy some
cheap shoes. I don't.
Cheap shoes are cheap cuz they make and sell one standard by the
thousands, one single width that is the norm for 90% of the
population. I don't have those feet, so if I'm gonna get shoes with
room to grow, circulate, yada yada, I'm going to be spending a lot of
time looking and spending some serious money buying. No Big 5 or
Walmart cheapos for my feet. They DON'T FIT!! End of story.
And you are contradicting your other postings 'Not BOB" so what is your
point? you ask 'What is your feet and spine worth?" and say '"No
Wallmart cheapos for my feet" now this....", there ya' go. You and a
billion Chinese couldn't possibly be wrong.".... perhaps you have multiple
people replying off your computer with different ideas on this subject?
On sober reflection, I conclude that I was in error. I completely left out
style, color, and the prominent display of the logo that translates "I'm a
designer product and am available only to the hoi polloi, not to be confused
with footware for the unwashed, plebian, masses. I, therefore, am worth of
acclaim and approbation. "
Now we gotta brush up on our Greek before we post to a.h.r?
I had no trouble understanding his post.
I had to check the urban dictionary to be sure-- but I think he meant
to say 'hoity toity'-- and perhaps with you in mind, twit;
"A person whom assumes that they are above you in any way without
cause or reason. This person normally has to find flaws in others to
make them feel better. "
BTW-- where's our pleonasm cop? Apparently 'the hoi polloi' qualifies.
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.