Repeating yourself only makes you wrong again. Nothing new.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Prospects of selling a house next door to a "reformed" spree killer?
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
So, you admit that you're out of bullets (as in "impotent"), eh Ronnie?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You are a bore, Ron. Nothing new folks. Move along.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You do like to repeat your lies. You've had loads of practice. You should be good at it.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Yes, Ron really does think that. Are you surprised?
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it desperately cowering behind krw desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it desperately cowering behind krw desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it desperately cowering behind krw desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it desperately cowering behind krw desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it desperately cowering behind krw desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it parasite desperately cowering behind Larry desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
No surprise that the best its ever been able to manage is lying parasite.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Some gutless f****it desperately cowering behind krw desperately attempted to bullshit and lie its way out of its predicament and fooled absolutely no one at all, as always.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
Thanks for bringing that up. Most states allow a person to defend HIS own home from intruders. Not be the watchdog and act under the color of the law for others. Having called 911 is where his authority ends. Crossing the street with a loaded shotgun, putting others in danger, is where he crossed the line.
Shooting in the back is murder. Even if he did fire a warning shot.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
...more shit from Ronnie's mouth.
>- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
...and even more shit from Ronnie.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
...more useless shit from the shit, Ronnie.
>- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
You really are tiring. A tiring liar.
>- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
More lies from a sack of shit.
>- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
I'm constantly surprised by the depths of his stupidity. Once I think he's at rock-bottom, he pulls the rug out from under himself, sinking further.
- Vote on answer
- posted
15 years ago
What I posted was an example and wasn't meant to be dispositive. The original assertion was that nobody can shoot a criminal in the back - I was merely trying to dispute that flawed claim.
You attach 9.41 to 9.42 and that is correct. But you should have kept reading:
9.43 PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON'S PROPERTY. A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, moveable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or tangible moveable property and: (1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted on consummated theft or or criminal mischief to the tangible moveable property; or (2) the actor reasonably believes that (A) the third person has requested his protection or the land or property; (B) he has a legal duty to protect the third person's land or property; or (C) the third person whose land or property he uses force or deadly force to protect is [related to the actor].