our country needs a new type of firearm for police

if hit it would disable the person immediately, but not kill them.

perhps something combining a physical hit with a neuro toxin that causes fast paralysis.

so the suspect isnt able to hurt anyone else,

Reply to
bob haller
Loading thread data ...

If you are going to be a dreamer, why don't you just dream that people behave themselves?

Reply to
Taxed and Spent

Lot of stuff has been tried and police also carry tasers but even they have killed people who had heart attacks afterwards. It is a pipe dream.

Reply to
Frank

Fast paralysis would most likely also stop the muscles that control breathing. You would have a non-zero number who would be allergic, croak, and thus cause uproars. There is a certain small number of people who die from Tazers, mostly those with unknown (at least to the cop) heart problems, high on various things (interactions with street drugs would likely be another concern of neurotoxins). Heck even just having someone hold them down can cause heart attacks or positional asphyxiation. If there was such a thing, the Defense Department would be working on it.

Reply to
Kurt V. Ullman

I saw on a TV drama once where the police fired a "bean bag" shotgun which knocked the person down and stunned them. Not knowing, would that be something viable for any initial assault.

I'm not a LE officer but those I know who are even think that the incidence of this action is out of control.

Reply to
bobm3

BS! In the Tulsa situation two different officers deployed weapons - one chose a gun the other the Taser. Not second guessing which was the correct choice, but that comment makes it seem the police are trying to kill someone rather than stopping a threat which is the intent (or should be). If the police WANTED to kill those people, the surest way would be to just ignore them and their calls for help when their neighbors turn on them.

Depends. I have a friend who was on scene commander at a barricade situation involving a looney tunes 70+ year old woman. This went on for weeks and they attempted to take her down (after she'd fired upon sheriff's deputies with a commitment order from the court) with a bean bag round. Apparently she watched the same TV drama and had wrapped and taped newspapers to her torso and extremities as a crude sort of body armor. Hit her with the bean bag in the chest and it didn't do much other than piss her off. (they eventually took her without injury)

Another one, within 6 miles of me involved a drugged out idiot who knifed a family member and was running around with a knife. He refused to stand still and cooperate and unfortunately when they fired the bean bag round he ducked rather than zag, took it in the head and was killed.

What people either forget or choose to ignore is that the streets are not a testing lab. The officer has a split second to react to the threat (real or perceived) and there normally is no time to try Plan B.

No doubt there are cases such as that. However, until all the facts are in and everything has been thoroughly analyzed the ones that you know - if they are speaking of either the Charlotte or Tulsa incident - should pour themselves a large cup of STFU and wait until the investigation is completed. It what they would want if they were in those officer's shoes. Either that or they are just idiots - Hey! It happens even in the best of departments.

BTW, could the Tulsa quick charging wind up being nothing more than an effort to placate the BLM crowd? Like Baltimore? Will the charges stand? Will there be a conviction? Stay tuned.

Reply to
Unquestionably Confused

The taser just makes the perp stand still long enough so they can shoot him.

Reply to
gfretwell

Both were the correct choice and they were used in the proper sequence. Now the question is whether they should have been used at all.

Reply to
Taxed and Spent

+1

And in another recent incident, the shooting outside the convenience store in Louisiana, the police apparently first used a taser and for whatever reason, it wasn't effective. They wound up wrestling with the perp on the ground and then shooting him. The perp had a gun in his pocket. Taser's aren't perfect, they rely on a dart with a wire sticking in the perp. Faced with an imminent deadly threat, they are not the solution.

Exactly. That's why it's so difficult to convict a cop in one of these shootings. If I was on the jury, even if the cop made a mistake, I'd have a tough time finding them guilty when they have a split second to make a decision in a volatile, toxic, dangerous situation that they did not create. The perp created it.

+1

+1

That seems to be the safest route these days. Charge knowing you have no case, then let the jury acquit a year or two later, when things have cooled down. What leads one to suspect that could be the case in Tulsa is how quick the charges were brought. It's hard to imagine they did a full, fair investigation of all the evidence in that short period of time.

Reply to
trader_4

If the thug disobeys the cop, shoot the thug in the head, put a tag on his toe and call the morgue.

One less problem for society to deal with. Get it?

Reply to
joe

No, what we need is a new type of citizen that obeys authority and complies to an officers command. In EVERYONE of this incidences, had the citizen/criminal complied and put their hands behind their backs and been carted off to jai they would ALL be ALIVE today. And your president has encouraged them to be disobedient. Hell, Massachusetts Supreme Court has declared that black men have a legitimate reason to run from the police. REALLY?

formatting link

Reply to
ChairMan

+1
Reply to
trader_4

There could be a downside to that. The perps would know they would survive and get more aggressive.

Better to train folks to ofay the commands of the cops.

Reply to
T

Doubt it would make a difference. It is widely known that if you commit a crime there is punishment, yet every day people are killed, cars are stolen, banks are robbed. They won't catch me though.

Reply to
Ed Pawlowski

How high is the reward on you now?

Reply to
T

The problem is we are soft on crime. Car thieves, bank robbers, telemarketers, street thugs should be euthanized. Eliminate the criminals and the world becomes a safer place for all of us.

Reply to
Tax Payer

And people who talk in theaters and fart in crowded elevators ...

I would not go as far as the death penalty on the above, although I would make it mandatory for a second offense pedophile. Or being British. Okay, not being British.

But you are right about the punishment. I think hard labor should be brought back. A good example of how to do things is the way Sheriff Arpaio does it.

Okay, maybe we should just force the British to lean French. Then they could condescend in two languages whilst their mouths are full of food.

Reply to
T

Per Bob F:

And the latest one - where the wife was shooting video while telling the cops that her husband was on some sort of medication.... I can't figure out why on earth the cops, at that point, couldn't have just backed off and waited for things to settle down... it's not like the guy had a pump-action shotgun and was firing at people.

Same with a 15-year-old girl recently: they handcuffed her, got her mostly into the car and then, when she refused to pull her feet inside the door, they maced her. Geeze..... How about you just step back and tell her than you're getting paid by the hour and she can lay there until the cows come home... but sooner or later she's going to get tired of it?

They seem heavily biased or trained towards exacting total immediate submission no matter what - and escalating force until they get it.

And how about the wacko hiding in the boat after planting the Boston Marathon bombs? They had him surrounded, there was no way in the world he was going anywhere... Nobody knew how many other bombs he had planted - so it would seem like a really, really, *really* good idea to take him alive and able to talk..... Instead they poured fire into that boat for at least 20 seconds.... by some miracle, he survived and was able to be questioned but it was just that: a miracle....... My impression of that whole thing was "Keystone Cops in action".

Reply to
(PeteCresswell)

That would require engaging his brain and that happens only on rare occasions.

Reply to
Gordon Shumway

The ofays already got that down. It's the #BlackLiesMatter types that appear to be ineducable.

Reply to
rbowman

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.