: :Dan_Musicant wrote: :> On Mon, 8 Jan 2007 08:13:49 PST, snipped-for-privacy@mojaveg.lsan.mdsg-pacwest.com :> (Everett M. Greene) wrote: :>
:> :"BobK207" writes: :> :> Dan_Musicant wrote: :> :> > On Sat, 06 Jan 2007 03:17:41 -0600, snipped-for-privacy@UNLISTED.com wrote: :> :> > :"Eric in North TX" wrote: :> :> > :>> btw I had to talk my neighbor out of using 1.25" for his main line :> :> > :>>
:> :> > :>> cheers :> :> > :>> Bob :> :> > :>
:> :> > :>Why? 3" would be ok if cost was no object. While it will still only :> :> > :>flow to the limit of the smallest restriction, the volume of water :> :> > :>"stored" in the big pipe would still help. :> :> >
:> :> > :OI missed the first part of this thread, but if this is just an :> :> > :average home, 3/4" in the norm, from the meter into the house. One :> :> > :inch is common from the water main (in the street) into the home and :> :> > :up tp the meter. :> :> >
:> :> > Average house = ? Maybe min'e pretty average (I'm the OP). The house is :> :> > 1925 square feet, with 2 baths, a laundry room and average sized yard. :> :> > I'm sure 3/4" is fine for me, but whoever moves in after me, who knows? :> :> > Maybe 3/4" from meter to house plumbing is perfectly adequate. In terms :> :> > of flow, I suppose it is. I figure the interior cross section is 2.25 :> :> > times that of 1/2" pipe, and on top of that the previous 1/2" pipe is :> :> > undoubtely quite corroded on the interior. Yes, some of that will have :> :> > sloughed off but I'm guessing that the resistance to flow is greater :> :> > than for new galvanized 1/2" pipe. :> :> >
:> :> > I figure probably the best argument for 1" would be that the water flow :> :> > would be slower and thus the noise of the water flow would be reduced :> :> > over 3/4". So I'm told. To me, it's theoretical at this point, but I'm :> :> > still in a position to ask for 1" over 3/4". The work isn't to begin :> :> > until at least tomorrow. :> :>
:> :> Choose 1", you'll be be happy & never have an issue with it. :> :>
:> :> Type L minimum, (Type K is better but probably un-necessary overkill) :> :>
:> :> My 1" Type L main line has been in the ground in Orange county CA since :> :> 1980; great flow, no issues. :> :>
:> :> Cheers :> :> Bob :> : :> :I haven't looked at prices, but the difference in cost :> :between 1" and 3/4" is probably minimal. Who knows if :> :some day someone will want the higher flow? It's far :> :cheaper to install the larger line now that it will be :> :to dig it up and increase the size. :> : :> :BTW: Is PVC a desired/allowed alternative? :>
:> The supervisor, when I asked him how much more 1" would cost than 3/4" :> today said over $600! Hardly minimal. Maybe after they'd started the job :> they figured they had me if I wanted to upgrade materials. At that :> point, they could have gone 1" without losing any work: :>
:> They did the job today. I tried to get ahold of the supervisor before :> they did any installation, but he didn't return my call. I had an :> explicit understanding with him that they were to install 3/4" L both :> underground and under the house. I talked with the foreman of the crew :> and he wasn't aware of that, but I told him I had a clear understanding :> with the supervisor. I also asked him about a bonding jumper at the :> meter and he seemed to whiff on that one - didn't know what it was or :> something. He talked about water heater! The supervisor didn't call me :> back and after a while I go under the house and see that they installed :> 3/4" M under the house, counter to my agreement. I tell the foreman and :> he says he's aware that he has to "rip it out." Why this has happened is :> beyond me. :>
:> I hear him talking to the supervisor on his cell phone and ask to talk :> to him. This is the same guy who the office was to have call me earlier. :> I try to ask him how much more it will cost to install 1" than 3/4", :> both would be L thickness. At this point, they were going to have to rip :> out the hard copper under the house and hadn't installed any soft copper :> outside, so there was no reason they couldn't do 1" instead. In either :> case, they were going to have to wait for a truck to deliver the copper :> they'd install. The supervisor said it would be over $600 extra! I asked :> him why and he said the materials cost that much more. I said screw :> that, basically. I call the office again (I'm not privy to the :> supervisor's cell number), and he calls me right back and affirms that :> 1" costs that much more for materials and I say I don't want that and :> they finish the installation this evening in the dark. :>
:> I have an idea that they never installed the bonding jumper, which I'm :> going to try to check out tomorrow when it's light. I don't know what it :> would look like. Would that be a strap between the copper pipe coming :> into the meter and the pipe leaving it and going to the house? :>
:> Dan : :I beg to differ....that supervisor (or his company) is either a thief :or stupid (in either case he is wrong) .... the increase in material :would be less than $100 closer to $50 : :cheers :Bob
Yeah, I told him on the phone the exact same thing except I didn't mention the $50. I gotta think they were just trying to see if they could squeeze a bunch out of me with that line. I don't think I'll use them again. Not unless I can see something to justify that $600 charge (which I declined, of course). I honestly think he might be stupid. Just don't know. How could he be THAT stupid?
Dan