It should (like all others that need to be rebuilt) be placed in a
different location that has stable soil, isn't below sea level and
further inland so it isn't prone to the significant force of a hurricane
Considering that no type of house is ever going to be absolutely safe, one
might also plan for the type of statement you want made in your afterlife.
Hey I got it ! Lets go to E bay find an old Russian nuke sub for sale .
We could buy it burry it so that the con is above ground and we should
be all set .
Or maybe we could just dry dock it so we could float away with the
I think the best idea yet is to build some where that is above sea
On the North Carolina shore - near the mouth of the Cape Fear, one fellow
built shacks on stilts. They get some fearsome hurricanes in those parts.
The stilts, he claimed, allowed the house to sway in the wind (rather than
resist and get pushed over). And the stilts kept the house from flooding in
Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:
Some of the codes for building at the shores take some of this into
consideration already. Most have to be raised about eight feet and no
utilities below that.
I'd probably use ICF construction. www.polysteel.com or
www.integraspec.com While the outside may have superficial damage, the
walls would not collapse. Shutters for the windows.
Plenty of supplies on hand, but I'd also have some sort of water
filtration/purification system. Generator, of course, but I'm now sure that
the best fuel would be. You'd want at least a two week fuel supply and
something easily replenished if longer term is needed.
Add Composting toilets, solar electric power and a large water storage tank
Dome type concrete construction with garage on bottom with water flow
through capability (open doors to let storm surge through) oh wait, I saw
one of these on Discovery channel already built in Florida. Built to
withstand over 300 mph winds.
In the Keys it is assumed you can't evaculate, so they are built to
I don't know details, but they are all on piers with heavy storm shutters.
Of course, they are above sealevel; not below it like NO. I suppose the
piers would have to be 15' higher, which doesn't seem practical.
Nehmo (in nalUe.27864$ firstname.lastname@example.org) said:
| How should this house be built and what should it have?
Solid but light. Wheels.
[and anti-troll protection]
DeSoto, Iowa USA
I'd build it using reinforced concrete with metal shutters to close over
the windows, it's own 30 day water supply and enough fuel to power a
backup generator for that same amount of time, and I'd build it on
columns at least 20' tall above the ground, or whatever the storm surge
level from a cat 5 storm is expected to be in that area.
So let's do a FULL recap of this house. I am going to save this for future use
Let's fill in the blanks and develope this and have it stand the test of
back-and-forth until we ALL agree on the resultant.
Let's also be realistic, but don't limit yourself. Let's be practical but
without any sacrifice on anything for the sake of safety & security most
FUTURE BUILDING SITE: N.O.
FOUNDATION SYSTEM: ?
FLOOR SYSTEM: ?
WALL SYSTEM: ?
ROOF SYSTEM: ?
DOORS & WINDOWS: ?
MOISTURE & THERMAL PROTECTION: ?
FORCE PROTECTION: ?
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS: ?
ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS: ?
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.