Whoa, think you are a bit mixed up. I don't have a book to reference the strengths of hardwoods so this is just for conifers. First, Douglas fir is the common name of the tree species Pseudotsuga menziesii. Tsuga is the genus of hemlock, so Pseudotsuga means false hemlock, but that name is based on tree aspect and not on any lumber characteristic. So Larry just mixed up larch with hemlock.
Lumber from conifers is often put in categories that combine more than one species. You have apparently not paid attention to the dashes in the categories as you have them wrong and made wrong conclusions. There is no dash between Douglas and Fir. The two strongest woods are Douglas fir and Larch which are combined into one general category "Douglas fir-Larch" (note the dash placement which applies to all the other categories you gave). Some other categories are Hem-Fir meaning hemlock and fir, Engelmann Spruce-Alpine Fir which is self explanatory, etc.
Your statement, "Douglas-Fir-Larch is the strongest of the Doug Firs," doesn't make sense. What can be state is that the Douglas fir-larch category of lumber is the strongest category and is comprise of a mix of Douglas Fir and Larch. The Douglas Fir South simply recognizes that lumber from Douglas fir trees growing further south tends to be a bit weaker than lumber from that species growing further north.