just not quite as far as those Lear Jet Conservatives
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
AAA: E15 could really fark up your car, void warranties
Loading thread data ...
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
that would probably be news to florida
of course, if memory serves, there are other crops with higher yield per acre is better than corn: sunchokes and hemp come to mind
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
which has nothing to do with the fact that it is energy positive
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Lear Jet hell, private 757. ^_^
TDD
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
bigger plane but still the same distance
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Like Air Force One which is kept airborne by the power of the Messiah. ^_^
TDD
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
The only reason they want to stop using ethanol for fuel, is because they want to drink the stuff. It's pure Moonshine, the best booze money can buy. I say it should be used for drinking. If people drink it, no one will be sober enough to drive anyhow, and we will no longer need fuel or cars. Dont just burn it up, enjoy it in a cocktail!!!
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Which has NOTHING to do with ethanol fuel in the U.S of A, or Canada.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
sure it does, it shows that there are reasonable alternatives to corn for ethanol that are energy positive
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Whereas those private 757 are kept aloft by the power of Lucifer
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Yea, I'm a Devil worshiper. ^_^
TDD
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Is that why conservatives are so dead set on telling women what they can or can't do with their bodies? They allegedly want small government, but they want to set it up inside a woman's uterus. You've got it all backwards again, Stormin Morlim, it's the conservatives who want to tell people how to run their lives. Too much Rush and Sean have rotted your brain.
formatting link
-- Bobby G.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Rush Limbaugh? For whom the cause is more important than the truth? And the ratings more important than the cause?
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
" snipped-for-privacy@optonline.net" wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@g6g2000vbk.googlegroups.com:
No.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Minor nit, since very little sugar cane ethanol is available in the US, which is what we were talking about. To sorta get this back on track, I have seen nothing to indicate that ethanol from sugar cane does any less damage to the vehicles. Anybody?>
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
Heck they of all people would know that it won't support cane production ON THE SCALE required.
Interesting chart of yields per acre and net energy.
formatting link
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
I agree. Everything I've seen indicates it's the ethanol itself that is the problem, not some contamination particular to the way it's produced. C2H6O is C2H6O.
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
LOL. Typical. I'll bet most Fox viewers know that the national debt is $16tril and $6tril of that has been added since Obama came to office. And I'll bet they have some idea that the deficit for the year that just ended was $1.1tril. And that Obama's only plan to do anything about it so far is to raise taxes on those "rich" people making $200K+, which would raise just $80bil. $1.1tril vs $80bil, that's some new math.
Now ask a lib about any of the above facts and virtually everyone I've seen is clueless. They would not know that the deficit in 2012 was $1.1tril. The only "fact" they know is that it's George Bush's fault and the solution is to raise taxes, even though the deficit problem is more than an order of magnitude larger....
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
But Obamahood takes from the rich and gives to the poor. ^_^
TDD
- Vote on answer
- posted
11 years ago
The Daring Dufas wrote in news:k9cvu7$hn4$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me: