Changing Botanical Names

There is a beautiful shy Australian called =91Sturt Desert Pea=92. I just included it in my ebook, and I try to be accurate when adding botanical names. Strangely, this one is =91Clianthus formosus=92 in some books, but =91Swainsona formosa=92 in others. I chose the latter because it seems a more recent naming. I found that in 1999 yet another classification was suggested but =93=85rejected by the scientific community=85=94 Question: who exactly determines a plant=92s classification? Thanks for replies =96 Klaus

formatting link

Reply to
k.jaritz37
Loading thread data ...

see

formatting link

formatting link
changes happen when the species moves to a new position in the hierarchy of taxonomy.

David

Reply to
David Hare-Scott

For a long time, flowering plants were classified mostly by the forms of their flowers, including microscopic examinations. Other characteristics were also used, but flower form was the primary characteristic.

In recent years, however, the advent of DNA sequencing has led to using that as the primary (almost sole) basis for classification. Two different plants with very similar DNA are now classed as closely related and might thus be separate species in the same genus or even separate varieties of the sam species. This has led to (1) a major reclassification of plants and (2) the creation of new genera and species.

For the botanical names of plants in my garden that I indicate on my Web site, I rely mostly on Sunset's "Western Garden Book", which might be considered the "gardening bible" for the U.S. and Canada west of the Rocky Mountains. Australia, of course, is outside the scope of that reference except for imports of some North American native plants into Australia and (more likely) exports of Australian native plants into North America.

A new edition of Sunset's "Western Garden Book" is published every few years. I currently have four different editions. When I get a new edition, I check all the botanical names shown on my Web site to see if any require updating. Often, the book parenthetically indicates prior botanical names when there has been a change. The book generally does not have botanical names for vegetables and fruit trees but does have botanical names for ornamental varieties of those.

Where the book does not list botanical names, I resort to Wikipedia.

Reply to
David E. Ross

[snipping part of my own prior reply]

The ultimate arbitrator of botanical names is the International Association for Plant Taxonomy.

Reply to
David E. Ross

You may find the article " Major changes to the Code of Nomenclature?Melbourne, July 2011" of interest:

formatting link

Reply to
Jeff Layman

+++++++++++++ Many thanks for very helpful reply - Klaus
Reply to
k.jaritz37

+++++++++++ Thank you for to-the-point reply - Klaus.
Reply to
k.jaritz37

+++++++++++++ Sincere thanks for very detailed and helpful reply - Klaus
Reply to
k.jaritz37

I am looking for some interested and informative posts in that forum during that search i got your post its nice i like your post.

Reply to
LouPhillips

HomeOwnersHub website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.