Hi Rick,
I disagree with your statements that it is a moot debate and that the world has three choices (though I do agree that greatly reduced breeding is the best option). Much of the world is rejecting GM crops. It is the Big Money Folks that tell the world what limited choices they have. Ourway or the Dieway.
You give credit to the FDA. The FDA has become a regulatory stamp for the big money concerns: ie; BigPharma, Monasanto, on and on ad nauseum. To use an FDA stamp of approval is BS or to even assume that the FDA any longer gives a fat baby's ass about anything but $$$$ is being naive.
Do you really believe that the GM folks are concerned about the starving people in this world? Or the FDA? Or Monsanto?
You are correct that nature and scientists have been improving varieties over the millennia, but even with hybridization, one's control is taken away by having to continually buy new seed. Saved seed from hybrids is a no go. One can only save seed and expect stable performance from stable plant varieties. That is the way to go. Genetic diversity and stability. Heirlooms have been developed that are regionally stable and productive and allow *individuals* to have control of their food, *not* the fascists.
GM crops are taking hybridization a step further and putting even greater control of the food supply in the hands of "them". And they who control the food supply control the people.
You recognize the inherent dangers in GM food. What is your data... your proof... that ingestion is not a bad thing? Why were Starlink contaminated products recalled if there is not doubt? Why have many countries banned the importation of GM products?
Perhaps I misunderstood the context of your post, but GM crops are
*not a good thing* ... IMO.Have a Good Life Charlie