I'm building stairs from my first floor
to the second floor of my house.
I'm using 2x12x16' stringers
One person says a certain method
is good and another says it is not. As
far as local building codes go, there's
no way I can call them, my house is a
disaster at the moment. However, my
reluctance to contact them doesn't mean
I don't want to do this right.
Anyway, I just left a web site where the guy
said that making the top tread flush with the
platform is "By far the preferred method".
Whoa!!! Everyone tells me you can't do that!!
To me it seems the most logical approach.
Why is everyone telling me not to do that?
That is, except for this web site.
The book I bought at Lowes recommends
double 2x10 with a 3/4 inch plywood attached
to the front of them. In the picture it looks like
half the stringer will attach to the 2x10 through
the plywood but the rest will just be on the
plywood. My ceiling Joist is a 2x8,
how does this method help me?
The stringer will barely be on the 2x8
because it has to be 7 inches down from the
top landing. Is this a stupid recommendation
..or am I stupid?
Others say to hook the last riser behind the 2x8 joist.
How in the world am I going to do the Math on that?
I gotta end up with an extra riser that has a run just
before it that is 1 7/8 inch longer than all the others?
Or get this, this web site says to make the last tread
an extra 2 inches to add in the joist width.
They said, "this doesn't usually weaken the stringer
Is it EVER wise to reduce the strength of a 16 foot board
with huge notches cut out anymore than you have too?
And to boot, isn't this clever modification at the worst posible
place....the point of attachment?
If anybody has any insight on what is really going on
please bring me into the light. For now, I'll just keep using
I'm not sure I follow everything you are saying. first of all,
usually, stairs in houses (not off of decks like is shown at your link)
are built between two walls, or at least have a wall under them, and
you can fasten the side stringers to walls on both sides. IMHO this is
the best way as fastening the stringers to the upper deck is sort of a
moot point (I use a joist hangar for the center stringer). running the
decking over the first "tread" (technically it would not be a tread,
but part of the second floor deck) can be done, but isn't typically, at
least where I'm from.. part of the reason is that in new construction,
you cut the stair hole well before you build the stairs. In cases
where you have 2x8 joists, ( don't see that much these days) you can
fasten a piece of 3/4 plywood to the top plumb cut of your stringers
and nail that to the joist. If you are concerned about the strength of
your stringers, you can add a 2x4 or even 2. But again, if your side
stringers are tied hard to walls or have walls built under them, I've
never had to do this.
all your risers and treads should be the same distance.
in stair building, there is definitely more than one way to skin a cat,
and most of them work.
Yes...that's how the old stairs were. I didn't
want to mimick the old stringers for many reasons.
Installing the new using the old concept appears
beyond my skill so I'm looking into "common"
From the one factory built and one site built staircases I've had done the
top is a riser which is attached to the FACE of the floor joists. The
couple of deck stairs I've built I ran the stringer into the face of the
joist and skipped the riser. The tread on top doesn't make sense to me
unless there is a reason to make the whole staircase 1 foot longer. The two
staircases I had the problem was getting the most tread while still making
the staircase fit in the allowable space.
This my problem now. I cut the stringer.
Rise = 7 3/4
Run = 9 3/4
This is still not steep enough to satisfy the 6' 10"
requirement on the bottom header. It measures
6' 5" from the nose of the 4th step to the header.
I already cut out a joist and put up a 9' laminate
to secure 6 joists. It will be alot of work to cut
out another, also, because the next joist down for bracing
is beat to shit, I will have to replace it as well.
I figure 3/4 of an inch should clear that bottom header.
Should I take it from the rise or run or both?
I don't care about code at this point, the house is old
and I have a full time job....this shit could go on for
Tough to make a suggestion without seeing the whole picture.
Unless 6'-10' is a local requirement you only need 6'-8".
It sounds like you are stuck with meeting code for header height or tread
width but not both. I don't like my toes hanging over the nosing going down
stairs so if you aren't getting this inspected I would not shorten the
treads and just not worry about the header issue.
The house I just moved out of had the header clearance at 6'-1" so my wife
put up a sign that said "Do not hit your head here. It will hurt".
Around here, headroom above the stairs only needs to be 6' 8" on the
leading edge of the stair tread (the same height as most doorway openings).
What kind of load is on the joist above the stairwell? If it's just a
closet or something, you might be able to install multiple shorter joists
(i.e. 4 - 2x4 joists, in place of a single 2x8 joist. You're so close to
the 6' 8" headroom, it just might be all you need.
If you can't enlarge the stairwell, you'll have to increase the rise and/or
decrease the run to make it fit the available space. Until recently (and
probably still in some areas), code allowed an 8" rise on residential
stairs. I don't know how many risers you have, but with 12 risers that
extra 1/4" would give you the additional 3" you need.
I had a similar situation when I rebuilt the stairs for our garage attic. I
couldn't enlarge the stairwell opening because it was in the corner of the
building, and headroom in the attic was already tight. And I needed even
more room because of the 10' ceiling in our garage. I ended up using an
8.25" rise with a 9" run, and installed 2x10's (9.25" deep) for my stair
treads. It doesn't meet current codes, but we find it to be very
comfortable to navigate, even with arm loads of boxes.
As for hanging the top of the stair treads, I used metal strapping (my
stair stringer starts one step down from the floor). I nailed the strapping
to the bottom of the stringer, bent it up around the edge that meets the
floor joist, then extend it up the full height of the floor joist. Once the
strap is nailed to the joist it makes a very strong connection. Nailing
into the bottom of the stringer eliminates any risk of splitting the
stringer, and the strapping takes very little space from the run. I
installed three stringers for a stronger stair.
We're actually getting ready to do some remodeling at my in-laws house.
Their basement stairs currently have 5' 6" of headroom over the treads, and
go directly under a bathtub. I'm 6 feet tall, so it takes some real ducking
to go down to their basement. :) Obviously, no amount of fiddling with the
rise or run is going to make a code approved stair fit in that space. So,
we're planning to remove part of the back porch and rotate the stairs 90
degrees so we can get full headroom over the stairs. Of course, that means
relocating the septic line. It quickly turns into a domino effect... :)
I botched this in my original post. It's 6'8" here too.
You must be clairvoyent. It is a closet. However,
and I could be seeing too linear, but the joist
under question is the brace for the other 6
cut joists. The next joist down the run is split
and even a novice like me wouldn't consider
using that as my new brace/sister. I really wish
I knew the right terms...I'd be boss then.
Thanks for the dialogue. It really helps
HomeOwnersHub.com is a website for homeowners and building and maintenance pros. It is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.